Re: raid10 write performance

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Dave Crooke
Тема Re: raid10 write performance
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTimaA0LqPAmSi--K1FkQqPXqKLpFLyhucDMI4y-w@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: raid10 write performance  (Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net>)
Список pgsql-performance
Of course, no backup strategy is complete without testing a full restore onto bare hardware :-)

On Tue, Jun 22, 2010 at 9:29 AM, Karl Denninger <karl@denninger.net> wrote:
Justin Graf wrote:
On 6/22/2010 4:31 AM, Grzegorz Jaśkiewicz wrote: 
Would moving WAL dir to separate disk help potentially ?     
Yes it can have a big impact.
WAL on a separate spindle will make a HUGE difference in performance.  TPS rates frequently double OR BETTER with WAL on a dedicated spindle.

Strongly recommended.

Be aware that you must pay CLOSE ATTENTION to your backup strategy if WAL is on a different physical disk.  Snapshotting the data disk where WAL is on a separate spindle and backing it up **WILL NOT WORK** and **WILL** result in an non-restoreable backup.

The manual discusses this but it's easy to miss.... don't or you'll get a NASTY surprise if something goes wrong.....

-- Karl


--
Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performance@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance


В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Karl Denninger
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: raid10 write performance
Следующее
От: Scott Carey
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: raid10 write performance