Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От David Schnur
Тема Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'
Дата
Msg-id AANLkTilzcY_VGBiYdTJ2bomtECxJxipSyW4AcpLMsO76@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-admin
@Julio Leyva: The table does get vacuumed at the end of the maintenance tasks; in this case it's not making it that far, of course.

@Scott Marlowe: Truncate isn't an option here, unfortunately.

I'm less concerned with the particular query than with the general question of when a shutdown could hang like this.  I expected this to be possible when using -m fast, but my understanding was that -m immediate really forced termination.

I'm setting up a test on the user's machine where it will try immediate first, rather than fast.

David

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Scott Marlowe
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Shutdown fails with both 'fast' and 'immediate'