Re: archive falling behind

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Albe Laurenz
Тема Re: archive falling behind
Дата
Msg-id A737B7A37273E048B164557ADEF4A58B05802F29@ntex2010a.host.magwien.gv.at
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: archive falling behind  (German Becker <german.becker@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: archive falling behind  (Strahinja Kustudić <strahinjak@nordeus.com>)
Re: archive falling behind  (German Becker <german.becker@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-admin
German Becker wrote:
> Here is the archive part of the config:
>
> archive_mode = on               # allows archiving to be done
>                                 # (change requires restart)
> archive_command = '/var/lib/postgresql/scripts/archive_copy.sh %p %f'           # command to use to
> archive a logfile segment
> #archive_timeout = 0            # force a logfile segment switch after this
>                                 # number of seconds; 0 disables

So the problem might be in that script.

> The archive coommand makes a local copy and then it copies to the backup server via ssh. Both copies
> are md5-checked and retried up to 3 times in case of failure.

archive_command should not retry the operation, but rather
return a non-zero return code.

> I have seen under heavy load that some WALs are skipped, some have less size, some are corrupted (i,e,
> the loop fails 3 times).
> I'm not sure about the return value (checking it). What is the expected behaviour of the archiver?
> Will it retry de archive if archive command returns differnt than 0? Will it retain the WAL segment
> until it is succesfuly archived?

See http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/static/continuous-archiving.html#BACKUP-ARCHIVING-WAL

archive_command should exit with zero only if the
WAL segment was archived successfully.
PostgreSQL will retry and retain the WAL segment until
archival succeeds.

Yours,
Laurenz Albe


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Federico
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: archive falling behind
Следующее
От: Paul Hinze
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Simultaneous index creates on different schemas cause deadlock?