Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)
Тема Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field
Дата
Msg-id 9EB22E4572ECF74AAFEAE743C74D26B203A87D6C@DEMUEXC005.nsn-intra.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field  (Merlin Moncure <mmoncure@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
As written before I have rerun the test a) without compression and b)
with enlarged BLOCK_SIZE. Result was the same.

BR
Ingo

-----Original Message-----
From: ext Merlin Moncure [mailto:mmoncure@gmail.com]
Sent: Wednesday, October 06, 2010 4:50 PM
To: Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)
Cc: ext Craig Ringer; pgsql-performance@postgresql.org
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] Runtime dependency from size of a bytea field

On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 10:22 AM, Sander, Ingo (NSN - DE/Munich)
<ingo.sander@nsn.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I thougth I have disabled compressing by setting alter command? Or is
> there another command?

yes.  have you re-run the test? got any performance results?

merlin

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] MIT benchmarks pgsql multicore (up to 48)performance
Следующее
От: Vincenzo Romano
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: On Scalability