Re: pg_restore question (-T and -t)

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От George Pavlov
Тема Re: pg_restore question (-T and -t)
Дата
Msg-id 8C5B026B51B6854CBE88121DBF097A860346491A@ehost010-33.exch010.intermedia.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на pg_restore question (-T and -t)  (Tony Caduto <tony_caduto@amsoftwaredesign.com>)
Список pgsql-general
Why not just try it! Answer: all -t switches after the first one are
ignored. (And, no, "pg_restore --help" does not mention that). However
with -l and -L, you have a much more powerful mechanism for specifying
exactly which objects you want restored.


> -----Original Message-----
> From: pgsql-general-owner@postgresql.org [mailto:pgsql-general-
> owner@postgresql.org] On Behalf Of Tony Caduto
> Sent: Wednesday, December 31, 2008 1:50 PM
> To: pgsql general
> Subject: [GENERAL] pg_restore question (-T and -t)
>
> Hi,
> does anyone know if you can do multiple
> -T or -t   (restore named trigger, restore name table) switches?
>
> In the docs for pg_restore it does not specify if it will accept more
> than one, but in the pg_dump docs the -n and -t switches allow
> multiples.
>
> Thanks,
>
> tony

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tony Caduto
Дата:
Сообщение: pg_restore question (-T and -t)
Следующее
От: Martin Gainty
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: pg_restore question (-T and -t)