Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Дата
Msg-id 8089.1448656526@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId  (Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Список pgsql-admin
Alvaro Herrera <alvherre@2ndquadrant.com> writes:
> Tom Lane wrote:
>> Couldn't creation and deletion of a toasted object within the same
>> transaction do it?

> I tried and couldn't find a way to cause one to appear.  When a row is
> created, it has xmax=0 so when it's deleted the xmax can just be set to
> the deleting xact.  And we don't ever update pg_toast rows, AFAIK.

Ah, nevermind, brain fade ... I was momentarily confusing this with
combo CIDs.  Right, there are no updates or row locks taken on toast
table rows (unless someone were to do one manually?)

            regards, tom lane


В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId
Следующее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: VACUUM unable to accomplish because of a non-existent MultiXactId