Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan
Дата
Msg-id 603c8f070910290835h10930c9dkb3e4677aeacd715b@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan  (Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan
Список pgsql-performance
On Thu, Oct 29, 2009 at 10:10 AM, Anj Adu <fotographs@gmail.com> wrote:
> Join did not help. A sequential scan is still being done. The
> hardcoded value in the IN clause performs the best. The time
> difference is more than an order of magnitude.

If you want help debugging a performance problem, you need to post
your EXPLAIN ANALYZE results.

http://wiki.postgresql.org/wiki/Guide_to_reporting_problems

...Robert

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Ludwik Dylag
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: database size growing continously
Следующее
От: Anj Adu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: sub-select in IN clause results in sequential scan