Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?
Дата
Msg-id 603c8f070905071920i47a6fb35r73876d28d39c9155@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?  (Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>)
Ответы Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?
Список pgsql-performance
On Wed, May 6, 2009 at 6:08 PM, Simon Riggs <simon@2ndquadrant.com> wrote:
> Agreed. Perhaps I should say then that the syntax needs to express the
> requirements of the planner/executor behaviour, rather than being the
> main aspect of the feature, as some have suggested.

Agreed.

> Hopefully, notions of partitioning won't be directly tied to chunking of
> data for parallel query access. Most queries access recent data and
> hence only a single partition (or stripe), so partitioning and
> parallelism and frequently exactly orthogonal.

Yes, I think those things are unrelated.

...Robert

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Indexes not used in DELETE
Следующее
От: david@lang.hm
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Transparent table partitioning in future version of PG?