Re: [HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers
От
Petr Jelinek
Тема
Re: [HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers
Дата
Msg-id
5612af25-fed5-1775-276c-8e1bbe1e6e43@2ndquadrant.com
Ответ на
[HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers (Peter Eisentraut)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers Petr Jelinek <petr.jelinek@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: [HACKERS] inconsistent application_name use in logical workers Peter Eisentraut <peter.eisentraut@2ndquadrant.com>
On 06/06/17 04:19, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > The logical replication code is supposed to use the subscription name as > the fallback_application_name, but in some cases it uses the slot name, > which could be different. See attached patch to correct this. > Hmm, well the differentiation has a reason though. The application_name is used for sync rep and having synchronization connection using same application_name might have adverse effects there because synchronization connection can be in-front of main apply one, so sync rep will think something is consumed while it's not. -- Petr Jelinek http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Stephen Frost
Дата: