Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches
От
Marko Tiikkaja
Тема
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches
Дата
Msg-id
54F73E96.8070702@joh.to
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
xpath changes in the recent back branches Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>
On 3/4/15 5:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote: > Robert Haas writes: >> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Marko Tiikkaja wrote: >>> I'm not sure how changing behavior like this in a minor release was >>> considered acceptable. > >> I'm guessing that the fact that it changes behavior in cases like this >> wasn't recognized, but I suppose Peter will have to be the one to >> comment on that. > > It was considered to be a bug fix; more, given the few complaints about > the clearly-broken old behavior, we thought it was a fix that would affect > few people, and them positively. Yeah, but these things usually go the other way. "This has been broken for 10 years but nobody noticed, so we're not going to fix this" is the answer I'm more used to seeing. And frankly, even though I remember getting the wrong end of that hose a few times, I prefer that to breaking apps in minor releases. .m
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления