Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Marko Tiikkaja
Тема
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches
Дата
Msg-id
54F73E96.8070702@joh.to
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
xpath changes in the recent back branches Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Marko Tiikkaja <marko@joh.to>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: xpath changes in the recent back branches Mike Rylander <mrylander@gmail.com>
On 3/4/15 5:26 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Robert Haas  writes:
>> On Thu, Feb 19, 2015 at 5:53 AM, Marko Tiikkaja  wrote:
>>> I'm not sure how changing behavior like this in a minor release was
>>> considered acceptable.
>
>> I'm guessing that the fact that it changes behavior in cases like this
>> wasn't recognized, but I suppose Peter will have to be the one to
>> comment on that.
>
> It was considered to be a bug fix; more, given the few complaints about
> the clearly-broken old behavior, we thought it was a fix that would affect
> few people, and them positively.

Yeah, but these things usually go the other way.  "This has been broken 
for 10 years but nobody noticed, so we're not going to fix this" is the 
answer I'm more used to seeing.  And frankly, even though I remember 
getting the wrong end of that hose a few times, I prefer that to 
breaking apps in minor releases.


.m


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
От: Marko Tiikkaja
Дата:
FAQ