Re: can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs

Josh,
 
I have increased them to 30, will see if that helps. Space is not a concern. slightly longer recovery time could be
finetoo. Wonder what people use (examples) for this value for high volume databases (except for dump/restore)...?
 
 
I don't know what is checkpoint_sibling. I'll read about it if there's some info on it somewhere.
 
Thanks,
Anjan
 
-----Original Message----- 
From: Josh Berkus [mailto:josh@agliodbs.com] 
Sent: Tue 10/26/2004 8:42 PM 
To: pgsql-performance@postgresql.org 
Cc: Anjan Dave; Tom Lane; Rod Taylor 
Subject: Re: [PERFORM] can't handle large number of INSERT/UPDATEs



    Anjan, 

    > Oct 26 17:26:25 vl-pe6650-003 postgres[14273]: [4-1] LOG:  recycled 
    > transaction 
    > log file "0000000B00000082" 
    > ... 
    > Oct 26 17:31:27 vl-pe6650-003 postgres[14508]: [2-1] LOG:  recycled 
    > transaction 
    > log file "0000000B00000083" 
    > Oct 26 17:31:27 vl-pe6650-003 postgres[14508]: [3-1] LOG:  recycled 
    > transaction 
    > log file "0000000B00000084" 
    > Oct 26 17:31:27 vl-pe6650-003 postgres[14508]: [4-1] LOG:  recycled 
    > transaction 
    > log file "0000000B00000085" 

    Looks like you're running out of disk space for pending transactions.  Can you 
    afford more checkpoint_segments?   Have you considered checkpoint_siblings? 

    -- 
    --Josh 

    Josh Berkus 
    Aglio Database Solutions 
    San Francisco