Can we write retrieving only 10 records from 4000 records
plz tell me asap
On Mar 23, 8:28 pm, t...@sss.pgh.pa.us (Tom Lane) wrote:
> Giorgio Valoti <giorgi...@mac.com> writes:
> > Are there any way to pass some hints to the planner? For example,
> > could the IMMUTABLE/STABLE/VOLATILE modifiers be of some help?
>
> Those don't really do anything for set-returning functions at the
> moment.
>
> As of 8.3 there is a ROWS attribute for SRFs that can help with one
> of the worst problems, namely that the planner has no idea how many
> rows a SRF might return. It's simplistic (just an integer constant
> estimate) but better than no control at all.
>
> As of CVS HEAD (8.4 to be) there's a capability in the planner to
> "inline" SRFs that are single SELECTs in SQL language, which should
> pretty much eliminate the performance differential against a comparable
> view. Unfortunately 8.4 release is at least a year away, but just
> so you know. (I suppose if you were desperate enough to run a privately
> modified copy, that patch should drop into 8.3 easily enough.) IIRC
> the restrictions for this to happen are
> * single SELECT
> * function declared to return set
> * function NOT declared strict or volatile
> * function NOT declared SECURITY DEFINER or given any
> local parameter settings
> The latter restrictions are needed so that inlining doesn't change
> the semantics.
>
> regards, tom lane
>
> -
> Sent via pgsql-performance mailing list (pgsql-performa...@postgresql.org)
> To make changes to your subscription:http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-performance