8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Christian Nicolaisen
Тема 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks
Дата
Msg-id 285fb20801281125k641902feo8d74b1c68640d94b@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks  (Arjen van der Meijden <acmmailing@tweakers.net>)
Re: 8x2.5" or 6x3.5" disks  ("Mike Smith" <mike.smith@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-performance
Hi

We are looking to buy a new server and I am wondering what kind of hardware we should buy and how to configure it.

We are either getting 8x 2.5" 15k rpm sas disks or 6x 3.5" 15k rpm sas disks.
If we go with the 2.5" disks I think we should run 6 disks in raid 10 for the database and 2 disks in raid 1 for os/wal
If we go with the 3.5" disks I think we should run 4 disks in raid 10 for the database and 2 disks in raid 1 for os/wal

The database has currently about 40gb data and 20gb indexes. The work consists mainly of small transactions, with
the occasional report. Currently we have 10gb ram, which is enough to hold the working set in memory 99% of the time.
The database server will only be running postgres, nothing else.

So, my question is: should I go for the 2.5" disk setup or 3.5" disk setup, and does the raid setup in either case look correct?

В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Claire McLister
Дата:
Сообщение: JDBC/Stored procedure performance issue
Следующее
От: Decibel!
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Vacuum and FSM page size