Re: An Analyze question

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Tom Lane
Тема Re: An Analyze question
Дата
Msg-id 26317.1019507557@sss.pgh.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: An Analyze question  ("Nick Fankhauser" <nickf@ontko.com>)
Ответы Re: An Analyze question
Список pgsql-admin
"Nick Fankhauser" <nickf@ontko.com> writes:
> In this case, we've got an unusual distribution that looks like this:

> Among the actors to which cases may be assigned:

> The State gets 10% of the cases
> 8 Judges get 3.5% of the cases each
> 50 Attorneys get about 0.1% each
> The remaining 388,000 actors get about 0.001% each.

> Given this unusual distribution, the planner can't predict well, so we're
> thinking that the best way to handle this is to set up a script to do our
> vacuum analyze, and then update stacommonfrac to be .01 for this particular
> field.

That's probably your best answer for 7.1 --- just force a suitable
fudge-factor into pg_statistic after any VACUUM ANALYZE run.

In 7.2, you could set the statistics target for actor_id to be 60 or 100
or so, and then the system would actually *know* the above distribution,
and moreover would know the names of the judges and the attorneys.
It'll be interesting to see how the plans change depending on whether
you are searching for a judge or not ...

            regards, tom lane

В списке pgsql-admin по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Nick Fankhauser"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: An Analyze question
Следующее
От: Jeremy Buchmann
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Hardware needed for 15,000,000 record DB?