Re: Partitioning WIP patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Bruce Momjian
Тема
Re: Partitioning WIP patch
Дата
Msg-id
20150303175349.GI5726@momjian.us
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Partitioning WIP patch (was: Partitioning: issues/ideas) Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch (was: Partitioning: issues/ideas) Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch (was: Partitioning: issues/ideas) Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch (was: Partitioning: issues/ideas) Corey Huinker <corey.huinker@gmail.com>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch (was: Partitioning: issues/ideas) Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch (was: Partitioning: issues/ideas) Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch (was: Partitioning: issues/ideas) Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Andres Freund <andres@2ndquadrant.com>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Jim Nasby <Jim.Nasby@BlueTreble.com>
Re: Partitioning WIP patch Amit Langote <Langote_Amit_f8@lab.ntt.co.jp>
On Fri, Feb 27, 2015 at 09:09:35AM +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> On 27-02-2015 AM 03:24, Andres Freund wrote:
> > On 2015-02-26 12:15:17 +0900, Amit Langote wrote:
> >> On 26-02-2015 AM 05:15, Josh Berkus wrote:
> >>> I would love to have it for 9.5, but I guess the
> >>> patch isn't nearly baked enough for that?
> > 
> >> I'm not quite sure what would qualify as baked enough for 9.5 though we
> >> can surely try to reach some consensus on various implementation aspects
> >> and perhaps even get it ready in time for 9.5.
> > 
> > I think it's absolutely unrealistic to get this into 9.5. There's barely
> > been any progress on the current (last!) commitfest - where on earth
> > should the energy come to make this patch ready? And why would that be
> > fair against all the others that have submitted in time?
> > 
> 
> I realize and I apologize that it was irresponsible of me to have said
> that; maybe got a bit too excited. I do not want to unduly draw people's
> time on something that's not quite ready while there are other things
> people have worked hard on to get in time. In all earnestness, I say we
> spend time perfecting those things.
> 
> I'll add this into CF-JUN'15. I will keep posting updates meanwhile so
> that when that commitfest finally starts, we will have something worth
> considering.

I am _very_ glad you have started on this.  There is a huge need for
this, and I am certainly excited about it.

--  Bruce Momjian          http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB                             http://enterprisedb.com
 + Everyone has their own god. +


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
От: Andres Freund
Дата:
От: Peter Geoghegan
Дата:
FAQ