* Robert Schnabel (schnabelr@missouri.edu) wrote:
> And getting back to the to-do list entry and reading the related
> posts, it appears that even if you could set work_mem that high it
> would only use 2GB anyway. I guess that was the second part of my
> question. Is that true?
Errr, and to get back to the to-do (which I've been considering doing
something about...), it's to allow the *actual* memory usage for things
like sorts to use more than 2GB, but as others have pointed out, you can
do that by putting pgsql_tmp on a memory filesystem and letting the
sorts spill to the memory-based FS.
Thanks,
Stephen