Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence
| От | Miernik |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | 20080723230404.3269.0.NOFFLE@turbacz.local обсуждение |
| Ответ на | how to fix problem then when two queries run at the same time, it takes longer to complete then if run in sequence (Miernik <public@public.miernik.name>) |
| Список | pgsql-performance |
Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com> wrote: > Well, my guess is that by running under Xen you're already sacrificing > quite a bit of performance, and running it with only 48 Megs of ram is > making it even worse. But if your budget is $100 a year, I guess > you're probably stuck with such a setup. I would see if you can get a > trial Xen at the other hosts with 128M or more of memory and compare. Is running in a 48 MB Xen any different in terms of performance to running on a hardware 48 MB RAM machine? I see that I am not the only one with such requirements, one guy even set up a site listing all VPS providers which host for under 7$ per month: http://www.lowendbox.com/virtual-server-comparison/ You can see that the most you can get for that money is a 128 MB OpenVZ I wonder if running PostgreSQL on OpenVZ is any different to running it on Xen in terms of performance. Oh here is something more: http://vpsempire.com/action.php?do=vpslite 256 MB for 7.45$ per month 512 MB for 11.95$ per month however it doesn't say what is the virtualization software, so don't really know what it is. -- Miernik http://miernik.name/
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления: