Dave Page wrote:
> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 4:55 PM, Stefan Kaltenbrunner
> <stefan@kaltenbrunner.cc> wrote:
> >
> > Tom Lane wrote:
> > > "Dave Page" <dpage@pgadmin.org> writes:
> > >> On Wed, Mar 12, 2008 at 3:41 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> > >>> That would explain a contiguous range of messages that were not indexed,
> > >>> but is that what we have?
> > >
> > >> Looking at the debug output, the messages that were missed were all contiguous:
> > >
> > > OK, that seems to support your theory. Might as well go ahead and
> > > reindex. +1 for getting some monitoring in there somewhere.
> >
> > yeah we will work on that and add some new ones to our current list of
> > 354 active checks ;-)
>
> One thing that crosses my mind - perhaps we should run a full index
> once per week to try to catch this sort of thing in the future?
Seems running it weekly would mean failures would disappear and not be
diagnosed.
-- Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> http://momjian.us EnterpriseDB
http://postgres.enterprisedb.com
+ If your life is a hard drive, Christ can be your backup. +