Hello,
I tried the partitioning scenario but I've got into
the same problem. The max function is not using the
indexes on the two partitioned tables...
Any other thoughts?
--- Ioana Danes <ioanasoftware@yahoo.ca> wrote:
> Thanks a lot I will give it a try.
>
> --- Dimitri Fontaine <dim@dalibo.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > Le mercredi 18 octobre 2006 21:51, Ioana Danes a
> > écrit :
> > > I am doing a test for a scenario where I have 2
> > > schemas one (public) for the operational data
> and
> > > another one (archive) for old, archived data. So
> > > basically I want to split the data from some
> huge
> > > tables in two. All data before 2006 in archive
> and
> > all
> > > data after and including 2006 in public.
> > [...]
> > > I got into a scenario where my plan does not
> work
> > > without doing code change.
> >
> > This sounds a lot as a ddl partitionning, you may
> > want to add some checks to
> > your schema and set constraint_exclusion to on in
> > your postgresql.conf.
> >
> > Please read following documentation material :
> >
> >
>
http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.1/interactive/ddl-partitioning.html
> >
> > Regards,
> > --
> > Dimitri Fontaine
> > http://www.dalibo.com/
> >
>
>
> __________________________________________________
> Do You Yahoo!?
> Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam
> protection around
> http://mail.yahoo.com
>
> ---------------------------(end of
> broadcast)---------------------------
> TIP 3: Have you checked our extensive FAQ?
>
> http://www.postgresql.org/docs/faq
>
__________________________________________________
Do You Yahoo!?
Tired of spam? Yahoo! Mail has the best spam protection around
http://mail.yahoo.com