Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Bruce Momjian
Тема Re: [PATCHES] Datetime patch
Дата
Msg-id 200307252012.h6PKCO918514@candle.pha.pa.us
обсуждение исходный текст
Список pgsql-hackers
[ Moved to hackers.]

(The discussion is whether we should support dates of the format
yy-mm-dd.  We already support yyyy-mm-dd, but we have code that would
see 97-01-01 and detect the first part was a year.)

Tom Lane wrote:
> Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us> writes:
> > I have never seen YY/MM/DD, only YYYY-MM-DD.
> 
> You have apparently forgotten what was standard practice just a few
> years ago.

Well, seeing as it hasn't worked for a date in three years, I don't see
how anyone could be using it unless they are only entering dates
per-2000, which seems unlikely.  It will be come useful again in 2032.

> > The huge problem is
> > deciding out how to decode 03-02-01.  I think we have to require the
> > century for those.
> 
> No, the entire point is to drive it off datestyle, *not* off the input
> value ranges.

If they supply a four-digit year, we assume yyyy-mm-dd, if not we follow
datestyle.  I can see someone wanting yy-mm-dd, but then we need a _new_
setting to control that, because the detection code for a year being >
31 just doesn't work in 2003.

I see what you are saying, that using the four-digit leading as
specifying a year is arbitrary, but it does allow us to accept both ISO
and US/European dates cleanly.  I guess the question is whether it is
worth allowing yy-mm-dd using a _new_ setting.  I still think we will
need the 4-digit rule for ordinary users.

The driving thing here was consistency, so the same session didn't
accept 19-8-03 and 8-19-03 while other dates like 01-01-03 were
following datestyle.  I don't see how the 4-digit rule actually is
inconsistent in that way.

> > If that is the only issue, I can ask on general, but I doubt someone is
> > going to pipe up.
> 
> I really dislike the idea that we are going to legislate this behavior
> in a three-person discussion on -patches.  The people who will be
> screaming about it don't read -patches.

I would be shocked to find someone screaming.  I have asked on general,
and if someone come up with a valid use for it, we can adjust it, even
during beta.  We can't tighten during beta, but we can loosen.

--  Bruce Momjian                        |  http://candle.pha.pa.us pgman@candle.pha.pa.us               |  (610)
359-1001+  If your life is a hard drive,     |  13 Roberts Road +  Christ can be your backup.        |  Newtown Square,
Pennsylvania19073
 


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: elein
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: best way to determine start of new statement within a function? (resend)
Следующее
От: The Hermit Hacker
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: v7.3.4 bundled ...