On Mon, 2008-11-17 at 09:53 -0700, Scott Marlowe wrote:
>
> Are you saying it's excessive you need the compound query? Cause
> that's running in 91microseconds as pointed out by Alan.
Of course, my bad. I read that as 91ms (<blush/>).
Confusion came from the fact that pgadminIII reports the query
taking 20-40ms, so I read the 0.091 as seconds not ms.
--
Dimi Paun <dimi@lattica.com>
Lattica, Inc.