Re: RC1 blocker issues

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Simon Riggs
Тема Re: RC1 blocker issues
Дата
Msg-id 1164405903.3841.716.camel@silverbirch.site
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: RC1 blocker issues  (David Fetter <david@fetter.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 12:37 -0800, David Fetter wrote:
> On Fri, Nov 24, 2006 at 02:48:22PM -0500, Tom Lane wrote:
> > I wrote:
> > > * possible rearrangement of pg_stat column order:
> > > http://archives.postgresql.org/pgsql-hackers/2006-11/msg00643.php
> > > Should we do this, and if so should we force initdb (via a
> > > catversion change)?  I'm currently leaning to the thought that if
> > > we change it we should force initdb, else we'll risk having a
> > > noticeable user-visible difference between different "8.2"
> > > installations.
> > 
> > Actually, on looking closer, we *must* force initdb because this
> > changes the expected output for the rules regression test.
> > 
> > So, yea or nay?  I'm working up the patch right now, but will hold
> > off applying until I hear some comments.
> 
> +1 on applying it.  Beta testers should understand what "beta" and
> "test" mean. :)

Yes, I would like to rearrange the columns.

--  Simon Riggs              EnterpriseDB   http://www.enterprisedb.com




В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Weird behavior in psql with \copy
Следующее
От: "Andrew Dunstan"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: RC1 blocker issues