Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Thomas Kellerer
Тема
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102
Дата
Msg-id
n70cbt$5ao$1@ger.gmane.org
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Christian Bjørnbak <cbj@touristonline.dk>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Edson Richter <edsonrichter@hotmail.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Jeremy Whiting <jwhiting@redhat.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Albe Laurenz <laurenz.albe@wien.gv.at>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Dave Cramer <pg@fastcrypt.com>
Re: Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Vladimir Sitnikov <sitnikov.vladimir@gmail.com>
Re: 9.4-1207 behaves differently with server side prepared statements compared to 9.2-1102 Thomas Kellerer <spam_eater@gmx.net>
Vladimir Sitnikov schrieb am 11.01.2016 um 14:05:
> The difference is as follows: 1202 can cache across statement.close()
> calls. 1201 can't do that.
> 
> In other words, to use server-prepared statements in previous
> versions, you had to reuse the *same* PreparedStatement *object* again
> and again. As soon as you issue .close() you lose your shiny
> server-prepared statement.
> 

Ah, thanks. 

В списке pgsql-jdbc по дате отправления
От: Dave Cramer
Дата:
От: Edson Richter
Дата:
FAQ