Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
От
Robert Klemme
Тема
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB
Дата
Msg-id
j4oe90$1i3$2@dough.gmane.org
Ответ на
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB (Stefan Keller)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Ondrej Ivanič <ondrej.ivanic@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Stephen Frost <sfrost@snowman.net>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Gianni Ciolli <gianni.ciolli@2ndquadrant.it>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Marti Raudsepp <marti@juffo.org>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Stefan Keller <sfkeller@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Claudio Freire <klaussfreire@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Shaun Thomas <sthomas@peak6.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB J Sisson <sisson.j@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB J Sisson <sisson.j@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB pasman pasmański <pasman.p@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Igor Chudov <ichudov@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Robert Klemme <shortcutter@googlemail.com>
Re: Postgres for a "data warehouse", 5-10 TB Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
On 13.09.2011 20:57, Stefan Keller wrote: > Interesting debate. Indeed. > 2011/9/13 Marti Raudsepp: >> Yes, every BEGIN/EXCEPTION block creates a subtransaction -- like a >> SAVEPOINT it can roll back to in case of an error. > > Are you sure? In theory I always understood that there are no > "subtransactions". What theory are you referring to? > In fact when looking at the docs there is chapter 39.6.6. saying "By > default, any error occurring in a PL/pgSQL function aborts execution > of the function, and indeed of the surrounding transaction as well. > You can trap errors and recover from them by using a BEGIN block with > an EXCEPTION clause." > (http://www.postgresql.org/docs/current/interactive/plpgsql-control-structures.html > ) > > So the doc isn't totally explicit about this. But whatever: What would > be the the function of a subtransaction? To give the possibility to > recover and continue within the surrounding transaction? I find this pretty explicit: It is important not to confuse the use of BEGIN/END for grouping statements in PL/pgSQL with the similarly-named SQL commands for transaction control. PL/pgSQL's BEGIN/END are only for grouping; they do not start or end a transaction. Functions and trigger procedures are always executed within a transaction established by an outer query — they cannot start or commit that transaction, since there would be no context for them to execute in. However, a block containing an EXCEPTION clause effectively forms a subtransaction that can be rolled back without affecting the outer transaction. For more about that see Section 38.6.5. http://www.postgresql.org/docs/8.4/interactive/plpgsql-structure.html Cheers robert
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления