Re: Unnessecary use of new Integer(n) in AbstractJdbc2ResultSet

Kevin Grittner wrote:
> Lew wrote:
>> Yeah, you have to use -bootclasspath to get the right rt.jar if
>> you use -target.
>
> I guess I didn't make my point very clearly.  I don't want to
> compile with an *earlier* target.  The *default* is to compile with
> the earlier bytecode target.  It won't actually *run* on the earlier
> JVMs because we're using the later API, so we're just hurting
> performance by *not* forcing the '-target 1.4' for -jdbc3 and
> '-target 1.6' for -jdbc4.
>
> If you don't believe me, look at this page for the bytecode level

Oh, I believe you!

-- 
Lew
Honi soit qui mal y pense.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/c/cf/Friz.jpg