Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server
От
Tomas Vondra
Тема
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server
Дата
Msg-id
fa91e97f5c67b2d07729a618ccca4bd7.squirrel@sq.gransy.com
Ответ на
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server (Ogden)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Tuning Tips for a new Server Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server "Tomas Vondra" <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server "Tomas Vondra" <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server "Tomas Vondra" <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server Scott Marlowe <scott.marlowe@gmail.com>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Tuning Tips for a new Server "Tomas Vondra" <tv@fuzzy.cz>
Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ "ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ "ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ "ktm@rice.edu" <ktm@rice.edu>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Andy Colson <andy@squeakycode.net>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ J Sisson <sisson.j@gmail.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Gary Doades <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Gary Doades <gpd@gpdnet.co.uk>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ "mark" <dvlhntr@gmail.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Greg Smith <greg@2ndQuadrant.com>
Re: Raid 5 vs Raid 10 Benchmarks Using bonnie++ Ogden <lists@darkstatic.com>
On 17 Srpen 2011, 16:28, Ogden wrote: > I was wondering what the best parameters would be with my new setup. The > work_mem obviously will increase as will everything else as it's a 64Gb > machine as opposed to a 16Gb machine. The configuration I posted was for > a 16Gb machine but this new one is 64Gb. I needed help in how to jump > these numbers up. Well, that really depends on how you come to the current work_mem settings. If you've decided that with this amount of work_mem the queries run fine and higher values don't give you better performance (because the amount of data that needs to be sorted / hashed) fits into the work_mem, then don't increase it. But if you've just set it so that the memory is not exhausted, increasing it may actually help you. What I think you should review is the amount of shared buffers, checkpoints and page cache settings (see this for example http://notemagnet.blogspot.com/2008/08/linux-write-cache-mystery.html). Tomas
В списке pgsql-performance по дате отправления