Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Jeff Davis
Тема Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts
Дата
Msg-id f9a3e6d7e60a890e2feaac93055e27f61fb2b351.camel@j-davis.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts  (Luc Vlaming <luc@swarm64.com>)
Ответы Re: New Table Access Methods for Multi and Single Inserts  (Luc Vlaming <luc@swarm64.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Mon, 2021-01-04 at 08:59 +0100, Luc Vlaming wrote:
> Reason I'm asking is that I quite liked the heap_insert_begin
> parameter 
> is_multi, which could even be turned into a "expected_rowcount" of
> the 
> amount of rows expected to be commited in the transaction (e.g.
> single, 
> several, thousands/stream).

Do you mean "written by the statement" instead of "committed in the
transaction"? It doesn't look like the TableInsertState state will
survive across statement boundaries.

Though that is an important question to consider. If the premise is
that a given custom AM may be much more efficient at bulk inserts than
retail inserts (which is reasonable), then it makes sense to handle the
case of a transaction with many single-tuple inserts. But keeping
insert state across statement boundaries also raises a few potential
problems.

Regards,
    Jeff Davis





В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alastair Turner
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposed patch for key management
Следующее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Libpq support to connect to standby server as priority