Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Jonathan S. Katz
Тема
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history
Дата
Msg-id
de8f2b8a-969b-455e-ee2d-0e2d144ff3ff@postgresql.org
Ответ на
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history (Tom Lane)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history PG Doc comments form <noreply@postgresql.org>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Kirk Parker <khp@equatoria.us>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Erik Wienhold <ewie@ewie.name>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history "Jonathan S. Katz" <jkatz@postgresql.org>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Pantelis Theodosiou <ypercube@gmail.com>
Re: Change "two" to "three" for decades of development in history Michael Paquier <michael@paquier.xyz> 
On 6/22/23 9:23 PM, Tom Lane wrote:
> Michael Paquier  writes:
>> "With multiple decades of development behind it, PostgreSQL.."
> 
> +1.  It sure seems silly trying to automate changing this.

+1. With the proposed language, we can revisit it once it gets to 
"centuries."

Jonathan
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления
Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Следующее
От: Joe Conway
Дата:
FAQ