Re: Bug or stupidity

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
Искать
От
Thomas Hallgren
Тема
Re: Bug or stupidity
Дата
Msg-id
cljd28$vth$1@sea.gmane.org
Ответ на
Re: Bug or stupidity (Stephan Szabo)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Bug or stupidity Philip Hofstetter <phofstetter@sensational.ch>
Re: Bug or stupidity Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Bug or stupidity Philip Hofstetter <phofstetter@sensational.ch>
Re: Bug or stupidity Karim Nassar <Karim.Nassar@NAU.EDU>
Re: Bug or stupidity Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Stephan Szabo <sszabo@megazone.bigpanda.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Re: Bug or stupidity Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Steven Klassen <sklassen@commandprompt.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Thomas Hallgren <thhal@mailblocks.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Steven Klassen <sklassen@commandprompt.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Mike Mascari <mascarm@mascari.com>
Re: Bug or stupidity Martijn van Oosterhout <kleptog@svana.org>
Stephan,

 > In general, when we add a backwards compatibility option, we give
 > a couple of versions before the default is changed.
 >
Perhaps the 8.0 would be a perfect time since it's a change of the major 
number.

 > In addition, until we have a form of delete which allows a "from"
 > list, there are some queries which are really more naturally written
 > in a form similar to add_missing_from
 > (although "from" lists would be better).
 >
Still, if the query is incorrect, I want to know about it. I don't ever 
want an incorrect behavior as a result of some behind the scenes magic. 
For me, there's no exception to that rule and my guess is that very few 
people would disagree if they think about it more in depth. This option 
helps no one. It only adds to the confusion.

 > I think that many people do, even if they don't realize it.
 >
If people write incorrect SQL because "this looks like the natural way 
of doing it", don't you think it's fair if they find out about the error 
ASAP? Catching errors early in the development process is generally 
considered a good thing. When this option is enabled, errors might be 
hidden (you get the notification that not everyone will pay attention 
to, or even see). I consider that a very *bad* thing.

It's perhaps OK that the option exists so that old legacy system can 
keep on running, but to have it enabled by default is not good at all.

Regards,
Thomas Hallgren
В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления
От: Steven Klassen
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Bug or stupidity
От: Dan Sugalski
Дата:
FAQ