Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Thom Brown
Тема Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached
Дата
Msg-id bddc86150911140149kece857eicd1d115df97d6c3a@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached  ("Valtonen, Hannu" <hannu.valtonen@f-secure.com>)
Ответы Re: pgmemcache vs pgmemcached
Список pgsql-general
Is there any documentation on this?  PgFoundry doesn't appear to have any.

Thanks

Thom

2009/11/13 Valtonen, Hannu <hannu.valtonen@f-secure.com>
On 11/13/09 5:26 AM, Juan Backson wrote:
Hi,

I had a chat with Suzuki Hironobu (pgmemcached maintainer) earlier this year and we pretty much decided that pgmemcache was the way to go after which Suzuku wrote a large patch to make it also support libmemcached behaviors and earlier PostgreSQL's.

So I'd recommend just going with pgmemcache.

- Hannu

ps. As a disclaimer, I'm the current pgmemcache maintainer, I've also cc'd Suzuki san.


I'm the current maintainer of pgmemcache


Hi,
Have anyone tried pgmemcache and pgmemcached?
What is the difference betweent he two?  They are both non-persistent,
so I have difficult time deciding which one to use.
Any suggestion?
Thanks,
jb


--
Sent via pgsql-general mailing list (pgsql-general@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-general

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: majordomo-owner@postgresql.org
Дата:
Сообщение: Rejected token 3A37-A32F-9E8B
Следующее
От: Thom Brown
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [pgeu-general] pgday.eu