Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender
Дата
Msg-id YJXrsWOexwSaSwQX@paquier.xyz
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Anti-critical-section assertion failure in mcxt.c reached by walsender  (Thomas Munro <thomas.munro@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения 
On Fri, May 07, 2021 at 04:42:46PM +1200, Thomas Munro wrote:
> Oh, and I see that 13 has 9989d37d "Remove XLogFileNameP() from the
> tree" to fix this exact problem.

I don't see that we'd be able to get a redesign of this area safe
enough for a backpatch, but perhaps we (I?) had better put some extra
effort in back-patching this commit while keeping XLogFileNameP()
around for compatibility?  How do people feel about that?
--
Michael
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: James Coleman
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Binary search in ScalarArrayOpExpr for OR'd constant arrays
Следующее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: JSON doc example (matchiness)