Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Curt Sampson
Тема Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?
Дата
Msg-id Pine.NEB.4.44.0209161255170.654-100000@angelic.cynic.net
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?  (Bruce Momjian <pgman@candle.pha.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Sun, 15 Sep 2002, Bruce Momjian wrote:

> The problem with the non-symlink solution is that it is error-prone/ugly
> on all the platforms, not just NT4.X.

Actually, it's really just the environment variable solution that's
error prone, I think. Putting it in the config file is fine. It's
just a matter of someone coding it.

cjs
-- 
Curt Sampson  <cjs@cynic.net>   +81 90 7737 2974   http://www.netbsd.org   Don't you know, in this new Dark Age, we're
alllight.  --XTC
 



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Proposal for resolving casting issues
Следующее
От: Justin Clift
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: PGXLOG variable worthwhile?