Re: GNU readline and BSD license

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Alex Pilosov
Тема Re: GNU readline and BSD license
Дата
Msg-id Pine.BSO.4.10.10012292123180.30602-100000@spider.pilosoft.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: GNU readline and BSD license  (Michael Alan Dorman <mdorman@debian.org>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On 29 Dec 2000, Michael Alan Dorman wrote:

> Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net> writes:
> > If there is something functionally wrong with Readline then let's talk
> > about it, but let's not replace it with something because some PHP dude
> > said that RMS said something.
> 
> ncftp used to be for non-commercial use only and had hooks to be
> linked against readline.  RMS threatened legal action, which caused
> the developer to change the license to GPL, which was what RMS wanted.
Problem with ncftp was developers distributing binaries commercially which
were linked to libreadline.

As I said before, postgres doesn't have this problem since neither RPMs
nor other binaries do that.



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: "Joe Conway"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Upper limit on number of buffers?
Следующее
От: Tim Uckun
Дата:
Сообщение: Creating locales.