Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-maskfields

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Arthur Nascimento
Тема Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs. address/IP-address/IP-maskfields
Дата
Msg-id CALVFHFYnXzkdLwCsqOw5zb9mD0=irQpO6U+D1qveu8WFo2A_Hg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Ответы Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields  (Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us>)
Список pgsql-bugs
Hi Bruce,

On Tue, 21 Apr 2020 at 15:27, Bruce Momjian <bruce@momjian.us> wrote:
> > 1. Near the top, there's a line saying "A record can have one of the seven
> > formats", then the followup list shows 9 formats. The ones on host[no]gssenc
> > were added to the IP-address/IP-mask section, but not to the address
> > section. I believe the intention was to have 11 lines there, with a
> > corresponding count at the top.
...
> I agree with your suggestions.  I also noticed that pg_hba.conf is
> missing gssapi entries too, so I added them to the attached patch. too.

I thought the list would jump to 11 lines there, meaning 1 local plus
5 on address plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.
As it stands now with 9 lines, it's 1 local plus 3 on address (it's
missing the two on host[no]gssenc) plus 5 on IP-address/IP-mask.

Tureba - Arthur Nascimento



В списке pgsql-bugs по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: BUG #16380: documentation: host[no]gssenc vs.address/IP-address/IP-mask fields