[GENERAL] union all taking years - PG 9.6

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Patrick B
Тема [GENERAL] union all taking years - PG 9.6
Дата
Msg-id CAJNY3ivu8eFkHWFA0k6FAoKyo1-hkEPPwoecy_1dK-sb_fNSFQ@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответы Re: [GENERAL] union all taking years - PG 9.6
Re: [GENERAL] union all taking years - PG 9.6
Re: [GENERAL] union all taking years - PG 9.6
Список pgsql-general
Hi guys.

I have two tables, where 'tableA' is the old and 'tableC' is the new one. I say "new/old" because we are migrating the data from tableA to tableC soon.

I created a view selecting from both tables, with a UNION ALL between them. When selecting from that view, it's really slow. I can't even run explain analyze (it's been 1h and query did not finished yet).

However, when running both selects with explain analyze, query is fast.


What should I do in this case? Why is that taking so long? I assume it's because the UNION will look for duplicates?

Thanks
Patrick.

В списке pgsql-general по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Thomas Kellerer
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [GENERAL] Insert performance and disk usage in JSON vs JSONB
Следующее
От: Andy Johnson
Дата:
Сообщение: [GENERAL] Add NAMEDATALEN to PG_CONFIG?