Looking at the V29 style tablesync slot names now they appear like this:
WARNING: could not drop tablesync replication slot
"pg_16397_sync_16389_6927117142022745645"
That is in the order subid + relid + sysid
Now that I see it in a message it seems a bit strange with the sysid
just tacked onto the end like that.
I am wondering if reordering of parent to child might be more natural.
e.g sysid + subid + relid gives a more intuitive name IMO.
So in this example it would be "pg_sync_6927117142022745645_16397_16389"
Thoughts?
----
Kind Regards,
Peter Smith
Fujitsu Australia