Re: pg_archivecleanup, and backup filename to specify as an argument
От | Fujii Masao |
---|---|
Тема | Re: pg_archivecleanup, and backup filename to specify as an argument |
Дата | |
Msg-id | CAHGQGwH2HxzH9+GvDH888i35vNV_KajV04NrxGWxd-PLdRjvTw@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
Ответ на | pg_archivecleanup, and backup filename to specify as an argument (Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com>) |
Ответы |
Re: pg_archivecleanup, and backup filename to specify as an argument
|
Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Jul 2, 2015 at 8:02 PM, Fujii Masao <masao.fujii@gmail.com> wrote: > Hi, > > While I'm implementing the patch around pg_archivecleanup, I found > the following warning about pg_archivecleanup in the document. > > Note that the .backup file name passed to the program should not > include the extension. > > ISTM that pg_archivecleanup works as expected even if the .backup file > with the extension is specified as follows. So, isn't this warning already > obsolete? Or I'm missing something? > > $ pg_archivecleanup -d -x .zip myarchive > 000000010000000000000009.00000028.backup.zip > pg_archivecleanup: keep WAL file "myarchive/000000010000000000000009" and later > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000005.zip" > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000003.zip" > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000001.zip" > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000007.zip" > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000006.zip" > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000004.zip" > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000002.zip" > pg_archivecleanup: removing file "myarchive/000000010000000000000008.zip" Even in 9.2 where -x option was added firstly, I confirmed that I could pass the .backup file name including the extension to pg_archivecleanup program. So I'm wondering if the warning in question was incorrect from the beginning... Or am I missing something? In the past thread of -x option patch, I found the following Robert comment. This makes me think that we unfortunately failed to notice his comment and finally added the unnecessary warning into the document. ----------------------------- http://www.postgresql.org/message-id/CA+TgmoZDYD_W7K_S1ZuEnqVNOaRWYCX=EETX+R27VB7akrrcEQ@mail.gmail.com Also, I'm wondering about this warning in the documentation: + extension added by the compression program. Note that the + <filename>.backup</> file name passed to the program should not + include the extension. IIUC, the latest change you made makes that warning obsolete, no? [rhaas pgsql]$ contrib/pg_archivecleanup/pg_archivecleanup -d -x .gz . 000000010000000000000010.00000020.backup.gz pg_archivecleanup: keep WAL file "./000000010000000000000010" and later ----------------------------- Regards, -- Fujii Masao
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: