Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Joshua Brindle
Тема Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
Дата
Msg-id CAGB+Vh71kLZYq+vt=KB4n81PxG8Ty+ODtp_AM-Zzqf41GHK_Bg@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles  (Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com>)
Ответы Re: [PATCH v2] use has_privs_for_role for predefined roles
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Feb 10, 2022 at 2:37 PM Joe Conway <mail@joeconway.com> wrote:
>
> On 2/10/22 14:28, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> > On Wed, Feb 09, 2022 at 04:39:11PM -0500, Joe Conway wrote:
> >> On 2/9/22 13:13, Nathan Bossart wrote:
> >>> I do wonder if users find the differences between predefined roles and role
> >>> attributes confusing.  INHERIT doesn't govern role attributes, but it will
> >>> govern predefined roles when this patch is applied.  Maybe the role
> >>> attribute system should eventually be deprecated in favor of using
> >>> predefined roles for everything.  Or perhaps the predefined roles should be
> >>> converted to role attributes.
> >>
> >> Yep, I was suggesting that the latter would have been preferable to me while
> >> Robert seemed to prefer the former. Honestly I could be happy with either of
> >> those solutions, but as I alluded to that is probably a discussion for the
> >> next development cycle since I don't see us doing that big a change in this
> >> one.
> >
> > I agree.  I still think Joshua's proposed patch is a worthwhile improvement
> > for v15.
>
> +1
>
> I am planning to get into it in detail this weekend. So far I have
> really just ensured it merges cleanly and passes make world.
>

Rebased patch to apply to master attached.

Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tom Lane
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: casting operand to proper type in BlockIdGetBlockNumber
Следующее
От: Zhihong Yu
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: casting operand to proper type in BlockIdGetBlockNumber