Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Ashutosh Bapat
Тема Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping
Дата
Msg-id CAFjFpReMzbHFhfnGRDOSK_FDftFbCNr3sgW_pt3EGzLDOyBoKA@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping  (Jeevan Chalke <jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com>)
Ответы Re: [HACKERS] Partition-wise aggregation/grouping  (Ashutosh Bapat <ashutosh.bapat@enterprisedb.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Mar 6, 2018 at 7:52 PM, Jeevan Chalke
<jeevan.chalke@enterprisedb.com> wrote:

>
>
> Changes look good to me and refactoring will be useful for partitionwise
> patches.
>
> However, will it be good if we add agg_costs into the GroupPathExtraData
> too?
> Also can we pass this to the add_partial_paths_to_grouping_rel() and
> add_paths_to_grouping_rel() to avoid passing can_sort, can_hash and costs
> related details individually to them?

I think so too.

-- 
Best Wishes,
Ashutosh Bapat
EnterpriseDB Corporation
The Postgres Database Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] path toward faster partition pruning
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Comment on top of RangeVarGetRelidExtended in namespace.cmentioning RangeVarGetRelid