Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Pavel Stehule
Тема Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray
Дата
Msg-id CAFj8pRCEy0SxmJjvVgOVq7EHR-6DiXR+ZW9jBaCYVjoQgyc1Hw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray  (Pavel Stehule <pavel.stehule@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
Дерево обсуждения


po 28. 1. 2019 v 20:47 odesílatel Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com> napsal:
On Fri, Jan 25, 2019 at 7:21 PM Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> Anyway I think the names need to be any-something.

To me, that seems unnecessarily rigid.  Not a bad idea if we can come
up with something that is otherwise acceptable.  But all of your
suggestions sound worse than Pavel's proposal, so...

I implemented commontypenonarray, and commontyperange types. Now, a SQL functions are supported too.

The naming is same - I had not a better idea. But it can be changed without any problems, if somebody come with some more acceptable.

I don't think so the name is too important. The polymorphic types are important, interesting for extension's developers what is small group of Postgres users. 

And personally, I think so commontype and commontypearray are good enough for not native speakers like me. But I am opened any variant - I think so this functionality is interesting
and partially coverage one gap in our implementation of polymorphic types.

Regards

Pavel



--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
Вложения

В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: leif@lako.no
Дата:
Сообщение: Fwd: Re: BUG #15589: Due to missing wal, restore ends prematurely and opens database for read/write
Следующее
От: Pavel Stehule
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: proposal: new polymorphic types - commontype and commontypearray