On Fri, Mar 2, 2018 at 8:27 AM, Andres Freund <andres@anarazel.de> wrote:
Hi, On 2018-01-20 14:51:12 +0200, Magnus Hagander wrote: > Finally found myself back at this one, because I still think this is a > problem we definitely need to adress (whether with this file or not).
This has an open CF entry for CF 2018-03. Given that there's still a lot of uncertainty what we want, I don't think that's a reasonable target. I would suggest moving it to 'returned with feedback'. Arguments against?
I agree, let's boot it. It needs more discussions about what to actually do, and after that how. Let's focus on other things for 11, and have this discussion again when the time comes. I'll go mark it.