Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqTL0TL_6y++sYAQi-qsgOWW3ZCXrPh19hebWC-sNY0FMw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver  (Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org>)
Ответы Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Tue, Jun 21, 2016 at 9:58 AM, Tatsuo Ishii <ishii@postgresql.org> wrote:
>>> Thanks, this looks good.  Could you please add it to the next commitfest
>>> so that it doesn't get lost and also so I can do an official review of it?
>>
>> Yes, I just did that. That's too late for 9.6 anyway with beta2 close by.
>
> Even there seems to be ongoing discussions on changing version number
> while in the beta period (and which definitely requires initdb). Why
> not changing system catalog during beta?:-)

I am not directly against that to be honest, but I'd expect Tom's
wraith showing up soon on this thread just by saying that. In the two
last releases, catalog bumps before beta2 because there were no other
choice. This issue is not really critical, just a stupid miss from me,
and we can live with this mistake as well.
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Tatsuo Ishii
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: primary_conninfo missing from pg_stat_wal_receiver
Следующее
От: Bruce Momjian
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Lets (not) break all the things. Was: [pgsql-advocacy] 9.6 -> 10.0