Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Michael Paquier
Тема Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility
Дата
Msg-id CAB7nPqRWQR=PBQErVR9g8apP-OR1pK7DScbJZD1VWm0zMoW+9g@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility  (Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility  (Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:46 PM, Michael Paquier
<michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 23, 2016 at 1:42 PM, Michael Paquier
> <michael.paquier@gmail.com> wrote:
>> While looking at the module I found two mistakes in the docs:
>> pg_visibility_map and pg_visibility *not* taking in input a block
>> number are SRFs, and return a set of records. The documentation is
>> just listing them with "returns record". A patch is attached.
>
> And that: s/PD_ALL_VISIBILE/PD_ALL_VISIBLE.

And would it actually make sense to have pg_check_frozen(IN regclass,
IN blkno) to target only a certain page? Same for pg_check_visible. It
would take a long time to run those functions on large tables as they
scan all the pages of a relation at once..
-- 
Michael



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Michael Paquier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Documentation fixes for pg_visibility
Следующее
От: "Tsunakawa, Takayuki"
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Question and suggestion about application binary compatibility policy