Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants
От
Michael Paquier
Тема
Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants
Дата
Msg-id
CAB7nPqQ_00oQQBfrLpe7c4u=5vR8OFpU61pRGLxy+_RZT5tFnA@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
[PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants (Nikolay Shaplov)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
[PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants Nikolay Shaplov <n.shaplov@postgrespro.ru>
Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined constants Michael Paquier <michael.paquier@gmail.com>
Re: [PATCH] amroutine->amsupport from numeric to defined
constants Teodor Sigaev <teodor@sigaev.ru>
On Tue, Apr 26, 2016 at 10:17 PM, Nikolay Shaplov wrote: > While working with postgres code, I found that for gist index number of > amsupport procs are defined two times. First in src/include/access/gist.h > > #define GISTNProcs 9 > > and second in src/backend/access/gist/gist.c > > amroutine->amsupport = 9; > > I think this number should be specified only once, in .h file. Yep, that sounds true. > So I would offer a patch for all access methods. That changes amsupport and > amstrategies from numbers to defined constants. (I've added two of them where > they were missing) It may be a good idea to make something similar for contrib/bloom if > 0 values are defined for amstrategies or amsupport for consistency. -- Michael
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления