Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011
От
Simon Riggs
Тема
Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011
Дата
Msg-id
CA+U5nM+o=fgLJhKWdKfjmfZ5D0sVPq6OLdSiWz6kX4UmHWLUmg@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
SQL key word list and SQL:2011 (Peter Eisentraut)
Список
Дерево обсуждения
SQL key word list and SQL:2011 Peter Eisentraut <peter_e@gmx.net>
Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011 Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011 David Fetter <david@fetter.org>
Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011 Heikki Linnakangas <heikki.linnakangas@enterprisedb.com>
Re: SQL key word list and SQL:2011 Simon Riggs <simon@2ndQuadrant.com>
On 19 May 2012 14:00, Peter Eisentraut wrote: > What I'd suggest is that we keep only the SQL:2011 column. The > differences from 2003 to 2011 aren't that great that it's very useful to > analyze the differences, and 1999 and 1992 are really only of > archeological interest. The SQL:2011 standard replaces previous standards, so I agree: we should only list the current version of the standard. The previous versions of the standard are simply no longer relevant. If people want that, we could have a little text at bottom saying Changes between 2008 and 2011 etc.. if that really is interesting - and if it really is then it should be listed as incompatibilities in the release notes. -- Simon Riggs http://www.2ndQuadrant.com/ PostgreSQL Development, 24x7 Support, Training & Services
В списке pgsql-docs по дате отправления
