Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
| От | Robert Haas |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | CA+Tgmob3-kMhdt2Xrp4dnvMByWTZMX5Q=hxiNSaGGPm8sidmYQ@mail.gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning (amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [POC] hash partitioning
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
On Thu, Oct 12, 2017 at 9:08 AM, amul sul <sulamul@gmail.com> wrote:
> How about combining high 32 bits and the low 32 bits separately as shown below?
>
> static inline uint64
> hash_combine64(uint64 a, uint64 b)
> {
> return (((uint64) hash_combine((uint32) a >> 32, (uint32) b >> 32) << 32)
> | hash_combine((unit32) a, (unit32) b));
> }
I doubt that's the best approach, but I don't have something specific
to recommend.
--
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company
--
Sent via pgsql-hackers mailing list (pgsql-hackers@postgresql.org)
To make changes to your subscription:
http://www.postgresql.org/mailpref/pgsql-hackers
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: