Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression
От
Robert Haas
Тема
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression
Дата
Msg-id
CA+Tgmob+LEp9tPJC3KteEdgk40WzSXyVnfuDZEfZkjEHZ4Ve7Q@mail.gmail.com
Ответ на
Список
Дерево обсуждения
Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Justin Pryzby <pryzby@telsasoft.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Heikki Linnakangas <hlinnaka@iki.fi>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Greg Stark <stark@mit.edu>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Robert Haas <robertmhaas@gmail.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Mark Dilger <mark.dilger@enterprisedb.com>
Re: Extending amcheck to check toast size and compression Aleksander Alekseev <aleksander@timescale.com>
On Wed, Nov 3, 2021 at 6:56 PM Mark Dilger wrote: > Done that way. I agree with what others have said: this looks fine. But, is it plausible to add test coverage for the new checks, or is that going to be too much of a pain? -- Robert Haas EDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления
