Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoaWsQM3youf=vNwH2tdJXaSJN2GNb47HFmt-SqLZe-dBw@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation  (Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@gmail.com>)
Ответы Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations defined atcluster creation  (Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@gmail.com>)
Re: [Patch] Make block and file size for WAL and relations definedat cluster creation  ("Tels" <nospam-pg-abuse@bloodgate.com>)
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Jan 3, 2018 at 3:43 PM, Remi Colinet <remi.colinet@gmail.com> wrote:
> Justifications are:

I think this is all missing the point.  If varying the block size (or
whatever) is beneficial, then having it configurable at initdb is
clearly useful.  But, as Andres says, you haven't submitted any
evidence that this is the case.  You need to describe scenarios in
which (1) a non-default blocksize performs better and (2) there's no
reasonable way to obtain the same performance improvement without
changing the block size.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company


В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Alvaro Herrera
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: [HACKERS] Proposal: Local indexes for partitioned table
Следующее
От: Stephen Frost
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: CFM for January commitfest?