Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?

Поиск
Список
Период
Сортировка
От Robert Haas
Тема Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?
Дата
Msg-id CA+TgmoYfxfFMjZB1amHEiGdL4KJb8Htj0fQWrRdxWL1bTg_G7Q@mail.gmail.com
обсуждение исходный текст
Ответ на Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?  (Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us>)
Ответы Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?
Re: Is user_catalog_table sensible for matviews?
Список pgsql-hackers
On Wed, Nov 9, 2016 at 12:17 PM, Tom Lane <tgl@sss.pgh.pa.us> wrote:
> The system will let you set the "user_catalog_table" reloption to "true"
> on a materialized view.  Is this sensible, or is it a bug caused by the
> fact that reloptions.c fails to distinguish matviews from heaps at all?
>
> If it is sensible, then I broke it in e3e66d8a9 ...

I can understand what that combination of opens would mean from a
semantic point of view, so I don't think it's insensible.  However, it
doesn't seem like an important combination to support, and I suspect
that the fact that we did was accidental.

-- 
Robert Haas
EnterpriseDB: http://www.enterprisedb.com
The Enterprise PostgreSQL Company



В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления:

Предыдущее
От: Markus Nullmeier
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size
Следующее
От: Robert Haas
Дата:
Сообщение: Re: Incorrect overflow check condition for WAL segment size