Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST
| От | Mark Dilger |
|---|---|
| Тема | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST |
| Дата | |
| Msg-id | B2AEFCD0-836D-4654-9D59-3DF616E0A6F3@gmail.com обсуждение исходный текст |
| Ответ на | Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST (Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru>) |
| Ответы |
Re: [HACKERS] [PATCH] kNN for SP-GiST
|
| Список | pgsql-hackers |
> On Sep 18, 2018, at 3:58 PM, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> wrote:
>
> On Mon, Sep 17, 2018 at 12:42 PM Andrey Borodin <x4mmm@yandex-team.ru> wrote:
>>> 17 сент. 2018 г., в 2:03, Alexander Korotkov <a.korotkov@postgrespro.ru> написал(а):
>>>
>>> Also, it appears to me that it's OK to be a single patch
>>
>> +1, ISTM that these 6 patches represent atomic unit of work.
>
> Thank you, pushed.
One note on this commit,
in my fork, I have converted BoxPGetDatum from a macro to a static inline function,
and it shows a thinko in your commit, namely that in->leafDatum is of type (BOX *),
but is actually (as the name implies) already a Datum:
spgquadtreeproc.c:469:27: error: incompatible integer to pointer conversion passing 'Datum' (aka 'unsigned long') to
parameterof type 'BOX *' [-Werror,-Wint-conversion]
BoxPGetDatum(in->leafDatum),true,
I'm not claiming this creates any active bug, just that it would make more sense to
handle the typing cleanly. Perhaps the following:
diff --git a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgquadtreeproc.c b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgquadtreeproc.c
index dee438a307..90cc776899 100644
--- a/src/backend/access/spgist/spgquadtreeproc.c
+++ b/src/backend/access/spgist/spgquadtreeproc.c
@@ -465,8 +465,7 @@ spg_quad_leaf_consistent(PG_FUNCTION_ARGS)
if (res && in->norderbys > 0)
/* ok, it passes -> let's compute the distances */
- out->distances = spg_key_orderbys_distances(
-
BoxPGetDatum(in->leafDatum),true,
+ out->distances = spg_key_orderbys_distances(in->leafDatum, true,
in->orderbys,
in->norderbys);
mark
В списке pgsql-hackers по дате отправления: